Now We Know: It Was Never About The Science
New report says Biden Administration paid hundreds of news organizations to "build vaccine confidence" for experimental COVID-19 shots
Funny thing about newsrooms - they’re almost exclusively concerned with not merely the meaning of one single event, but what it portends for any potential future outcomes.
Like a weather pattern pointing at a coming downpour or the meteoric rise of a local politician to the national stage, the followup is nearly always: “where exactly is this going?”
It was crystal clear to anyone with a pulse that in March 2020, the outcome of an emerging pandemic that forced the shutdown of commerce on a global scale would - duh - result in the eventual push for mass vaccinations.
It didn’t matter whether the virus was deadly or even particularly dangerous in most population sectors.
Nor did it matter that the experimental therapies had not yet undergone anything resembling the rigorous trials that any legitimate vaccine has undergone since the days of Jonas Salk.
No, all that mattered was how the pharma giants would leverage the American people - of whom roughly 1 in 5 identify as vaccine skeptics - to take what, as of this writing, is still an unproven gene therapy cocktail.
So it should come as no surprise when an investigation from The Blaze found the “federal government paid hundreds of media companies to advertise the COVID-19 vaccines while those same outlets provided positive coverage of the vaccines”.
Read that again.
Your federal tax dollars were funneled back into the mainstream media ecosystem to persuade - intimidate? humiliate? - you, the American taxpayer, into taking the vaxx.
The ads were purchased on TV, radio, print and on social media from the some of the biggest names in the American media landscape:
Los Angeles Times
New York Post
This list is by no means exhaustive; it omits the “hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations” from which the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) purchased air time, according to an FOIA request filed by The Blaze.
In addition to advertising, the Biden Administration reportedly recruited social media “influencers” and “experts” - including the now-notorious Dr. Anthony Fauci - to land interviews with the media and promote the mRNA vaccine.
It’s not yet known how much advertising money the HHS spent on each media platform, the report added.
We already knew Pfizer sponsored health content on nearly every major news network, but this new report asserts an even more aggressive strategy.
So was it effective?
Since Dec. 2020, when COVID-19 vaccine distribution began in the U.S., over half a billion doses have been administered. More than 215 million Americans - nearly 65 percent of the total population - are now considered fully vaccinated, including 3 in 4 adults and 88.8 percent of seniors.
Another roughly 95 million people have also received at least one booster dose.
That is what you call a successful marketing strategy.
“What’s wrong with encouraging people to protect themselves against what at the time appeared to be a highly infectious virus?”, you might ask.
Plenty, not least of which is the fact that the Pfizer shot has nearly 1,300 documented side effects - a truth which was reportedly kept hidden from the public until a judge in January forced the FDA to release clinical data.
You may recall the FDA initially wanted the data kept from the public for 75 years and released in 2096.
You know, because science.
And now that same U.S. government is buying up roughly 50 million doses to be administered to children under the age of 5, pending FDA (“emergency”) approval.
Pray that effort never comes to pass.
Now that “war with Russia” has all but obliterated the COVID narrative from the homepages and A-blocks of MSM outlets, it’s perfectly legitimate to question whether the last two years of incessant pro-vaccine messaging was, at its core, possibly the single most lucrative psychological operation ever conducted on the American populace.
In 2021, Pfizer was projected to bring in roughly $36 billion in worldwide sales just from the company’s COVID vaccine, shattering its previous record and earning it the title of the bestselling drug ever.
Moderna fell short of its competitor, netting around $18 billion in COVID-19 vaccine sales for the year.
Despite the findings that suggest the vaccines didn’t provide any real long-term immunization from COVID.
Despite the fact that COVID deaths among the vaccinated rose sharply with the Omicron variant.
Despite the realization that even with underlying conditions the survival rate for anyone contracting the virus remained over 99 percent.
If the above data had been promoted at just a fraction of the rate of the “COVID will decimate the most vulnerable among us” stories, would Pfizer, Moderna and the like still have had a shot at breaking their own sales record?
If news outlets like CBS, LA Times, and yes, even Newsmax hadn’t saturated their content with scary-sounding (but ultimately sensationalized) COVID headlines, would those astronomical sales numbers and draconian lockdown measures have ever been possible?
What is the technical term for corporations working hand in hand with government to influence the populace?
If you know the answers to these questions, why do you continue to ask the wrong ones?
For the last two years, you and I were subjects in what was perhaps the biggest psychological experiment ever conducted.
It was sophisticated.
It was global.
It was unrelenting.
It was narrative embedded with data.
It was moralization disguised as science.
It was propaganda passed off as news.
It was more profitable than any venture in recorded history.
And the whole time they told anyone who raised an objection to shut up.
They smeared you as “anti-science”.
A culture that murders its unborn, emasculates its boys and prostitutes its girls in the name of “equality” felt empowered enough to go after you, the critical thinker, in the name of science.
We can never forget this moment. This was only the first act.
Rest assured, there will be a second.